Skip to content
cllm Source

← back home · compare

cllm vs llama.cpp

C/C++ inference engine — host-OS

llama.cpp is the engine. cllm is the kernel that will run it. We borrow the v1 HTTP API shape and the model loading interface; we replace the host OS underneath.

Feature cllm llama.cpp Advantage
Host operating system None (unikernel) Linux, macOS, Windows Comparable
Inference path Skeleton; engine integration on roadmap Mature C/C++ engine with ggml backend llama.cpp
HTTP API llama.cpp-shaped v1 endpoints Native llama-server with v1 endpoints Comparable
Model formats GGUF (planned via llama.cpp path) GGUF + legacy formats llama.cpp
Target architecture i386 (Multiboot), QEMU + bare-metal x86_64, ARM64, more llama.cpp
GPU support Roadmap (CUDA design only) CUDA, Metal, Vulkan, ROCm, SYCL llama.cpp
Attack surface One ELF, no userspace, no shell Whatever the host OS exposes cllm
Boot time Milliseconds from Multiboot Seconds to bring up the OS first cllm
Memory footprint 4 MB heap arena today Tens of MB minimum process RSS cllm
Debuggability GDB on :1234 via make run-debug Mature debugger and profiler ecosystem llama.cpp

Pick cllm when

  • You want a minimal serving substrate with no host OS to maintain
  • You care about boot time, attack surface, and image size — not portability across desktop OSes
  • You are building an inference appliance and would rather ship one ELF than a Linux distribution
  • You want to be able to read every line of code between the NIC and the model

Pick llama.cpp when

  • You need inference running today, on real weights, against real benchmarks
  • You want broad model coverage and active upstream contribution
  • You run on macOS, Windows, or non-x86 Linux where cllm has no target yet
  • You depend on community-built quantizations, GGUF tooling, and downstream wrappers

Still deciding?

cllm and llama.cpp solve different layers of the same problem. Reading the source for both is the fastest way to know which one belongs in your stack.